What is your position on capital punishment? Assume that you are in favor of capital punishment, what do you think is the most humane manner of execution? Why? Conversely, assume that you are against capital punishment, discuss how you think these offenders should be sentenced? (will need 2 replies as well with students initial post)
Please review the files. I will upload a sample brief done by the professor. I will also upload a format document. Brief will be on Terry v. Ohio (1968) and Birchfield v. N D. (2016) TOTAL: 2 seperate breifs
Your written assignment is to submit a paper on the case study below. Based on the nature of this scenario, it is anticipated that a thorough examination will result in approximately 5-7 pages of text, not including your cover page, abstract, and references. You must cite a minimum of two (2) scholarly resources in the body of your paper. Please make sure that you are meeting all of the criteria outlined in the Assignment Requirements. Click on the link below to view the case study: https://content.bellevue.edu/cst/CJUS/310/wk-8-8.2-case-study-william-and-michelle.pdf Based on this scenario, address the following issues: Do you think Michelle should be found guilty of negligent infliction of severe and emotional distress? Why or why not? If she is found guilty, what should her punishment be? Do you think Michelle should be charged with being in violation of the federal Mann Act? Why or why not? If she is found guilty, what should her punishment be? There is a difference between a pedophile and a sexual predator. Due to William being of consenting age, Michelle is not considered a pedophile. Knowing her history of seeking out a certain type of inferior male, do you think she is a sexual predator? Why or why not? If the situation was reversed and it was a 24-year-old male high school teacher dating a 16-year-old female student, would the situation be different? Explain.
Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you analyze the relationship between ethics and professional behavior in the administration of criminal justice. Explain the role of critical thinking with regard to the relationship between ethics and professional behavior. Include in your paper a proposal for a seminar in ethics training for law enforcement officers. In your proposal, choose five areas of ethical conduct and that will be stressed in the seminar. Explain why you chose those areas and what the expected benefits of the training will be for both officers and the community. Include at least four peer-reviewed references Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
Develop a hypothetical scenario involving a Ponzi scheme. Explain the details of the investigation/criminal activity. How much money was involved? How many people did it affect? What were the financial implications of the scheme? (Discussion post, will need 2 replies as well on students initial post)
This is a discussion post that also requires two replies to my peers. Compare and contrast your findings and analysis to that of your peers. Not everyone is eligible for public defense services. Do you think everyone should be eligible for public defense services? Why or why not?
Analyze the plausibility—if there can be any—of the contention that there might have been a certain justification for the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States. In your essay, compose an argument for or against an alleged pattern of American wrongdoing that could possibly merit such an attack. Whatever your position, support it with one theoretical assumption or hypothesis from the readings to date. Your answer should not exceed 500 words (about two double-spaced, typed pages).
2 full pages, single or double spaced for each chapter total of 6 pages. Place a Chapter Heading to Introduce each Chapter. Chapter 7- Social Process Theories: Socialization and Society Chapter 8- Social Conflict, Critical Criminology, and Restorative Justice Chapter 9- Developmental Theories: Life Course, Latent Trait, and Trajectory
Discuss how the DHS prepares and provides assistance to law enforcement agencies. Discuss how the agencies communicate regarding legislation requirements (in person, via electronic means, via paper, etc.) and how this may impact their positions. Conclude with a paragraph that addresses your own thoughts on this agency’s inception and current effectiveness that includes how the DHS has (or may) impact how your coworkers respond to situations and interpersonal situations within the workplace.
Look at the “elements of thought” and compare them to the “right questions”. What are the similarities and differences? Is one approach ‘better’ than the other or should their positive points be blended one with the other (and if so, which ones)? Your paper should be a minimum of 3 pages and should be written with good grammar and APA style citations and references. Use double-spacing and 12-point Times New Roman font.